Musings and learning about technical communications issues from your TechCommGeekMom–a geeky mom who is into tech comm…since 2012.
Author: TechCommGeekMom
Danielle M. Villegas is a technical communicator who currently employed at Cox Automotive, Inc., and freelances as her own technical communications consultancy, Dair Communications. She has worked at the International Refugee Committee, MetLife, Novo Nordisk, BASF North America, Merck, and Deloitte, with a background in content strategy, web content management, social media, project management, e-learning, and client services. Danielle is best known in the technical communications world for her blog, TechCommGeekMom.com, which has continued to flourish since it was launched during her graduate studies at NJIT in 2012. She has presented webinars and seminars for Adobe, the Society for Technical Communication (STC), the IEEE ProComm, TCUK (ISTC) and at Drexel University’s eLearning Conference. She has written articles for the STC Intercom, STC Notebook, the Content Rules blog, and The Content Wrangler as well. She was very active in the STC, as a former chapter president for the STC-Philadelphia Metro Chapter, serving and chairing on several STC Board committees, and most recently was the STC Board Vice-President before the organization closed.. You can learn more about Danielle on LinkedIn at www.linkedin.com/in/daniellemvillegas, on Twitter @techcommgeekmom, or through her blog.
All content is the owner's opinions, and does not reflect those of her employers past or present.
This is a great infographic brought to my attention by Christopher Pappas. I can vouch for many of the results of some of these results from personal experience, being that I earned my Masters degree from an online program. I hope that I’ll be able to do another online program in the future–that’s how much I believe in online learning!
The Turing test has been passed by a robot named Eugene. So, asks Alex Hern, is it time to pledge fealty to the machines?
Danielle M. Villegas‘s insight:
I find this story interesting. While we talk a lot about content localization and translation, as well as about content in and of itself, this is interesting to see how content is being used for artificial intelligence. Part-way through reading the transcript, I think I might have picked up that this was not a human. I’ve spoken/written with enough people whose written language skills weren’t good to know. Still, it’s a pretty close attempt and worth noting.
It makes me wonder if in time, technical communicators will be responsible for writing the content for artificial intelligence. Maybe. Time will tell, so it’s important to take note of this milestone.
An ENIGMA coding machine, found at the Computer History Museum (photo credit: TechCommGeekMom)
Technical communicators truly do have skills that most others don’t have, and it’s a simple set of skills. We take for granted that we can display writing and documentation clearly.
What brought this to my attention most recently–as if I didn’t know this fact already–was dealing with emails from work. I was trying to interpret emails from several educated, fairly influential people from the company, and I didn’t have the faintest idea what they wanted because of unclear directions. Granted, it didn’t help that the email system that we are forced to use at the moment (Lotus Notes) is not exactly user-friendly when it comes to formatting content within an email. Even when I could wade through the quagmire of formatting fogginess, what was being requested of me was not completely clear, and I had to send emails back clarifying the requests.
Although we are often required to work on reducing the number of words used to relay our messages and act as translators of content, it shouldn’t be at the cost of miscommunication. Sometimes having more is less, because more detailed directions can provide less back-and-forth of emails, thus more efficiency in getting the work or task done. From a customer perspective, having accurate documentation–even if it’s long–can reduce call centers help requests significantly.
A great example of making sure that content–whether it’s an email or any other documentation–is efficient is when I worked at the Princeton University Press. The CMS I had to use was an in-house Frankenstein monster of an application, but it worked for better or worse. There was no printed documentation, so when I first started working for the company, I took lots of detailed notes to make sure I understood how to do tasks on the system. I left the company after a few months, but left my notes for my successor. About two years later, my successor left, and my former manager asked me back to fill in temporarily, since she knew my contract had ended, and my ramp-up time wouldn’t be the same as if a new person was coming in during the pinch of getting the new fall catalog posted online. Sure enough, the two-year-old notes were still at the desk, and I could still follow them clearly. (This was when I knew that techcomm was truly my calling!) This reduced the number of times I had to ask my manager to refresh my memory on how to do certain tasks. As a result, the fall catalog information went up quickly, and everyone was happy. Mind you, the documentation I had was pages and pages long–all handwritten, no less, but it was accurate enough that I didn’t need much help in re-learning the system. My second successor was able to use these notes as well, since they were so accurate.
As I said, we take for granted that we have the ability to write cogently and clearly since we all do it on a regular basis. It’d be nice if more people can get the basics of this skill down so that we technical communicators can do our jobs more efficiently. The fact that we can decipher and clarify messages better than anyone should put us in the same ranks of ENIGMA coders, in my mind!
Endless scrolling saves people from having to attend to the mechanics of pagination in browsing tasks, but is not a good choice for websites that support goal-oriented finding tasks.
Danielle M. Villegas‘s insight:
Found this compliments of Scott Abel. This is something I try to always preach to everyone I know. Less scrolling is better! Sometimes scrolling is inevitable, but the less you have to do, the better. It’s better to format content in a way to make it as easily accessible as possible. This article is a great find!
There is only one trait that makes the difference between a bad technical writer and a great one. And it’s not what you think.
Danielle M. Villegas‘s insight:
I was rather relieved when I saw this article today from my friend, author Sharon Burton, who is a technical communicator extraordinaire herself. Right now when I read several blogs from well-known commentators, it seems like a tug-of-war with what direction technical communication is going in.
"Focus on DITA and XML!"
"Single-sourcing is the name of the game!"
"Simplified English is needed!"
"No, you’re all wrong. You should be learning code and learning how to do API and developer documentation!"
My head is in a tailspin trying to figure out what I need to do to stay ahead of the game, if my contract should expire and I need to look for work again. What’s a "young" (ahem) technical communicator to do?
Reading Sharon’s words were a breath of fresh air in the congestion of all this "what-to-do" that’s going on. This single trait that she speaks of is what has always driven me forward, and will continue to drive me forward. I do worry, however, that in the realism of trying to find a position in the workforce, that for many employers, that’s not enough. I can usually learn a new piece of software within the first few weeks of using it, but no one is willing to take the time to teach me necessarily. I’m sure I’m not the only one who feels like this. And being a slightly older worker (in my forties now), I’m at a disadvantage because I fall between the cracks–I’m experienced, but not experienced enough for higher positions, yet not as digitally nimble as the millenials (although I’d like to think that I am).
Here’s hoping the trait that Sharon promotes is what gets me through to retirement!
Read the article for yourself, and comment below on your perspective.
You must be logged in to post a comment.