Posted in Uncategorized

2014 eLearning Conference 3.0 at Drexel University – Slides!

Today was a bit of a new achievement for me.

I broke out of the tech comm mold a little bit, and actually did an e-learning, or more specifically, an m-learning presentation today at the e-Learning Conference 3.0 at Drexel University in Philadelphia today. I was totally out of my comfort zone, because while I love to talk about and share what I know about m-learning, I’m not an m-learning professional, meaning this is not something I do everyday like the rest of the attendees. I also had never been in front of such a large group (there were 50+ people in the room! New record for me!), and among those who DO use e-Learning everyday. I was grateful that I had people come up to me and tell me they liked my presentation. I was glad that at the end of my presentation, I was able to get a conversation going in the room about m-learning practices.

Not bad for a content strategist, eh? 😉

Due to popular demand (okay, some attendees asked for it), here are the slides that I used. If they don’t make sense for some reason, feel free to ask questions in the comments, or email me directly.

Enjoy!

 

Posted in Uncategorized

The Power of Social Media! 2014 case: Bowflex

Back in February, as we were essentially trapped in the house due to the extra mountains of snow that got dumped on NJ, my husband and I realized that we needed some way to exercise. We both have sedentary jobs, and we’re busy parents, so it’s hard to squeeze in that much time for ourselves during the day. I also have issues with many forms of exercising due to my asthma and joint issues (leftover from injuries in past years) that require that I need to do something that’s easier on my joints. We also didn’t want to go to a gym, or have to trek through bad weather to get to one, and decided that we wanted to invest in some sort of exercise equipment beyond the Total Gym that we own– something that would promote aerobic exercise. After careful research and shopping, we decided to invest in a new piece of equipment by Bowflex called the MAX machine, which is hybrid between a stair-stepper, elliptical, and skiing machine.

It turns out that this MAX machine had been released as a new product in December 2013, and ended up being more popular than Bowflex anticipated. So in early February, as we ordered the product, we had been forewarned on the website that it would take about 45 to 60 days to ship. We weren’t happy about that, but we figured that it’d be worth the wait. Six to eight weeks isn’t TOO awful, and we were getting free shipping due to a coupon.

During our wait, we’ve received two “update” emails that really didn’t tell us anything. The subject line would say, “Update, and something free for you,” but it would not give us any update about our order, but rather some free nutritional or diet information.  On the bottom of each email, next to the “unsubscribe” link, a warning told you that if you unsubscribed, then you wouldn’t get any update information about your order. Well, gee. I don’t want information about the nutritional stuff, but I don’t want to miss out on something that might come through about my actual order, so I’m stuck with these.

Seven weeks have passed, and my husband is getting anxious and impatient. “Where is it? You did get a receipt for it, right? Do you have an order number?” he has been asking me. To settle things, since the website itself would not yield any information about my specific order other than I placed the order, I made a call to the company.  I explained that the 60 day mark was approaching–is our order almost ready? “Oh, dear, I’m sorry– it’s 45 to 60 BUSINESS days,” the customer service operator cooed, in the same sort of tone as a Southerner muttering, “Bless her heart.”

Now, understand first, I’m no dummy, not when it comes to consumer matters. The first three years of my career were working for two companies doing the same thing as this person–being on the other end of a toll-free hotline, answer questions about anything from baking soda to toothpaste to detergent to over-the-counter drugs including laxatives.  My career made a segueway into IT-related fields because I transferred those customer service skills to client services skills, which eventually landed me at a dot-com, and I had the computer savvy to work my way out of client services into content management. So, it takes a bit to pull the wool over my eyes. I KNOW that website didn’t say “45-60 business days” when I ordered. It might say it now, and they might claim that it’s been up there the whole time, but that’s something that I would remember very clearly.

So, after getting off the phone, I decided to take out my frustrations and make a bit of a stand. I posted my views on Twitter to bring this situation to light. It took four Tweets, and in 140 characters for each tweet, I was able to state my disgruntlement to the whole world:

@bowflex sucks. Ordered MAX machine in Feb. Told 45-60 days to ship. Website didn’t say BUSINESS days when I ordered. Will ship in MAY. 😦

@bowflex must’ve update website in meantime. I only get “we’re still here, & here’s nutrition info while you wait” info from them. Useless.

What would be more helpful from @bowflex would be “it’s 3 wks until shipping”, “It’s 2 wks until shipping” notices instead. This cost me $$

Bad logistical planning on @bowflex’s part, & bad customer service. This machine better be worth the wait & the $$$. Better comm needed.

Oh yes, I knew what I was saying. Hey, I was angry! But I knew that from the first tweet with “bowflex sucks”, I would get their attention. I did receive two tweets back which I didn’t see right away, but I would swear that within 20 minutes or so, I suddenly had a phone call from…yep, you guessed it, Bowflex.

It was a civil conversation–I didn’t go all Jersey Girl on the gal who called me. Obviously, they weren’t too happy with “bowflex sucks” and apologized for the delays and the customer service. I explained that the first person I talked to was professional, and she did nothing wrong, but I didn’t like the answer, even if she was just the messenger. I was positive that “business days” was not spelled out when I put the order in, nor was it in any of the correspondence, or on the website, and I explained my disenchantment with the updates, since they clearly did not yield any information about my order.  All I wanted was transparancy about my order, is that so much to ask? I explained that this was a communications disaster, coming not only from the perspective as a consumer, but also as a technical communicator. The website was bad, at least as far as the follow-up and ordering part was concerned, and I just wanted better communication with the company. At the end of the conversation, I felt that I was heard, an apology was made, and an extra discount was scored, which was welcomed. I wasn’t looking for the extra discount (not that I wouldn’t take it), but a consumer shouldn’t have to ask for such basic information. It doesn’t have to be exact, but it does have to be clear.

Case in point–I had recently ordered something much smaller from a company on eBay. eBay said that the package was estimated to arrive on a Wednesday, and generally packages took five to nine days to arrive once it shipped. Well, my package arrived a day too late for an event on day 10, but it was still close that I can’t be as angry about that. This issue with Bowflex was VERY expensive and taking much, much longer, and I wasn’t even getting an estimate that we were even getting close to a potential shipping date. I was just getting free diet plans instead.

I tend to think that I wouldn’t have gotten a phone call if the social media person hadn’t seen that I have over 800 followers on Twitter. I’m sure that’s what prompted the call rather than hashing it out online. That’s okay. But to me, it still proves that there is significant power in the use of social media. People are using it. People do see these tweets. Companies understand the potency of one malicious tweet.

I was invited to follow the company on Facebook and direct-message them on Facebook if I had any further questions. Ironically enough, I went to the page, “liked” it, and then saw that within the last week, other consumers who had purchased their MAX machines in January either just got them (within 60 days–not business days), OR that someone had ordered it in January or February, and they were given the same line about the “business days” and said it wasn’t there when they ordered their machines. I felt validated that it wasn’t just me–it really wasn’t, so it seems! The power of social media was at work again, showing that I wasn’t wrong, and that Bowflex was trying to cover up the problems.

Don’t get me wrong–I’m still looking forward to getting my MAX machine. And I’m sure I’ll be a Bowflex convert once I get it.  The real lesson in all of this is two-fold. First, the company’s content–which includes its email notifications and its ordering website–are lacking. A consumer can’t get full disclosure about their expensive products, when a company that is as big as Bowflex/Nautilus should be much more robust. The second part of this proves that social media is a very powerful medium. It has the power to message the world and influence at an instant, in 140 characters or less.

As technical communicators, it’s our jobs to help make sure, through the web content that we help write and through the social media messages we send, that the message that we want to send out on behalf of either ourselves or our clients is a clear, concise, informative message.  It seems to me that somebody at Bowflex/Nautilus is asleep at the wheel, and I’m sure it’s not just for this product alone. The person who is handling their social media at the moment should be applauded, as I’m sure she’s going through one hell of a time dealing with disgruntled consumers like myself, and staying positive in the process. (Give that gal a raise, Bowflex.) She’s merely the messenger, and it’s a hard job, especially in customer service. (Like I said, I’ve been there, I know.)  Our job as technical communicators is really to help make life a little easier for the customer service department by giving them good information, and reducing call volumes because most of the information should be available online, especially if you did your shopping online.  Two phone calls in one day shouldn’t need to happen.  Something in the pipeline broke, but it wasn’t the social media person, and it wasn’t the customer service person. I’m just sayin’.

So, Bowflex/Nautilus, if you need a technical communicator who has your best interests at hand both as a consumer and a content analyst, let me know. I might be able to help.

Posted in Uncategorized

Content Strategy and the Royals

KateWillsIt was recently announced that in the UK, the Royal Family was going through a bit of a corporate merger and restructuring, one might say. Her Majesty The Queen is getting up there in age (she’s almost 88 years old), and while she still maintains a full schedule that probably would put people half her age to shame, it was announced that her communications office and the communications office of her son, HRH The Prince of Wales, would be merging. This inferred that 65 year-old Prince Charles, who’s of retirement age himself yet shows no signs of slowing down either, is slowly going to be taking on more affairs of the regency on behalf of his mother. While the Queen has vowed never to abdicate or give up the throne (and if she lasts as long as her own mum, that could be another 15 years), it looks like she might be winding down to a point that she is slowly transitioning the affairs of state to Charles, as well as delegating responsibilities to her grandchildren as well. According to the Sunday Telegraph, “Reports suggest the move should avoid clashes of coverage of royal events as younger royals perform more engagements, and spread expertise in modern media.”

For more information, read this article.

Even HRH Prince Charles is wondering how this transition relates to content strategy. "Do tell, TechCommGeekMom."
Even HRH Prince Charles is wondering how this transition relates to content strategy. “Do tell, TechCommGeekMom.”

So, all this is fine, but what does this have to do with content strategy, you may ask? Simple. This scenario really isn’t that different than any other company having to merge content written by different departments, like that of technical content writers and marketing content writers. Everyone in the merger or restructing needs to speak the same “language”, or to use a better description, they all need to use the same terminology. One of the issues that has been surfaced in recent tech comm talk in conferences and blogs is the idea of “silos”–different departments writing content, but not getting together to make sure that everyone is using the same terminology and language to communicate the company message consistently. This can lead to mixed messages in print, in multimedia, and online very quickly if everyone isn’t on the “same page”. Joe Gollner’s Adobe Day-Lavacon 2013 talk came to mind as I was thinking about this merger, and what it meant to have different departments sending out different messages.

Don't think too hard about it, Prince Harry. It's really not that complicated.
Don’t think too hard about it, Prince Harry. It’s really not that complicated.

So, the merger of the royal communications offices makes total sense, really. In an age where news is spread quickly throughout the internet, especially through social media, it seems like a proactive move on the part of the royals to start this transition. One office will need to juggle multiple products–in this case, the royal family members–by providing a single voice and consistent message to promote their activities or relevance, whether it be in print or by digital means. The royals are already a bit ahead of the curve of many corporations, having already set up fairly active websites and social media presence on the internet. They even have their own YouTube account and several Twitter accounts, for example! The communications offices are already on top of internet media, and this step seems like a modern move that many companies are still hesitant to make.  Perhaps the royals, known for being a bit stuffy and overly traditional, might actually be cutting edge, and setting the example of how to move forward in the 21st century.

It’s something to think about.

Posted in Uncategorized

2013 in review, Part 2

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2013 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The concert hall at the Sydney Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 9,600 times in 2013. If it were a concert at Sydney Opera House, it would take about 4 sold-out performances for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.