Posted in Uncategorized

2014 eLearning Conference 3.0 at Drexel University – Slides!

Today was a bit of a new achievement for me.

I broke out of the tech comm mold a little bit, and actually did an e-learning, or more specifically, an m-learning presentation today at the e-Learning Conference 3.0 at Drexel University in Philadelphia today. I was totally out of my comfort zone, because while I love to talk about and share what I know about m-learning, I’m not an m-learning professional, meaning this is not something I do everyday like the rest of the attendees. I also had never been in front of such a large group (there were 50+ people in the room! New record for me!), and among those who DO use e-Learning everyday. I was grateful that I had people come up to me and tell me they liked my presentation. I was glad that at the end of my presentation, I was able to get a conversation going in the room about m-learning practices.

Not bad for a content strategist, eh? 😉

Due to popular demand (okay, some attendees asked for it), here are the slides that I used. If they don’t make sense for some reason, feel free to ask questions in the comments, or email me directly.

Enjoy!

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Are you ready for the future of content?

Larry Kunz has written a great article about the disparities coming up in content writing, and how we can start to fix it.

I recommend reading:

Are you ready for the future of content?.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Power of Social Media! 2014 case: Bowflex

Back in February, as we were essentially trapped in the house due to the extra mountains of snow that got dumped on NJ, my husband and I realized that we needed some way to exercise. We both have sedentary jobs, and we’re busy parents, so it’s hard to squeeze in that much time for ourselves during the day. I also have issues with many forms of exercising due to my asthma and joint issues (leftover from injuries in past years) that require that I need to do something that’s easier on my joints. We also didn’t want to go to a gym, or have to trek through bad weather to get to one, and decided that we wanted to invest in some sort of exercise equipment beyond the Total Gym that we own– something that would promote aerobic exercise. After careful research and shopping, we decided to invest in a new piece of equipment by Bowflex called the MAX machine, which is hybrid between a stair-stepper, elliptical, and skiing machine.

It turns out that this MAX machine had been released as a new product in December 2013, and ended up being more popular than Bowflex anticipated. So in early February, as we ordered the product, we had been forewarned on the website that it would take about 45 to 60 days to ship. We weren’t happy about that, but we figured that it’d be worth the wait. Six to eight weeks isn’t TOO awful, and we were getting free shipping due to a coupon.

During our wait, we’ve received two “update” emails that really didn’t tell us anything. The subject line would say, “Update, and something free for you,” but it would not give us any update about our order, but rather some free nutritional or diet information.  On the bottom of each email, next to the “unsubscribe” link, a warning told you that if you unsubscribed, then you wouldn’t get any update information about your order. Well, gee. I don’t want information about the nutritional stuff, but I don’t want to miss out on something that might come through about my actual order, so I’m stuck with these.

Seven weeks have passed, and my husband is getting anxious and impatient. “Where is it? You did get a receipt for it, right? Do you have an order number?” he has been asking me. To settle things, since the website itself would not yield any information about my specific order other than I placed the order, I made a call to the company.  I explained that the 60 day mark was approaching–is our order almost ready? “Oh, dear, I’m sorry– it’s 45 to 60 BUSINESS days,” the customer service operator cooed, in the same sort of tone as a Southerner muttering, “Bless her heart.”

Now, understand first, I’m no dummy, not when it comes to consumer matters. The first three years of my career were working for two companies doing the same thing as this person–being on the other end of a toll-free hotline, answer questions about anything from baking soda to toothpaste to detergent to over-the-counter drugs including laxatives.  My career made a segueway into IT-related fields because I transferred those customer service skills to client services skills, which eventually landed me at a dot-com, and I had the computer savvy to work my way out of client services into content management. So, it takes a bit to pull the wool over my eyes. I KNOW that website didn’t say “45-60 business days” when I ordered. It might say it now, and they might claim that it’s been up there the whole time, but that’s something that I would remember very clearly.

So, after getting off the phone, I decided to take out my frustrations and make a bit of a stand. I posted my views on Twitter to bring this situation to light. It took four Tweets, and in 140 characters for each tweet, I was able to state my disgruntlement to the whole world:

@bowflex sucks. Ordered MAX machine in Feb. Told 45-60 days to ship. Website didn’t say BUSINESS days when I ordered. Will ship in MAY. 😦

@bowflex must’ve update website in meantime. I only get “we’re still here, & here’s nutrition info while you wait” info from them. Useless.

What would be more helpful from @bowflex would be “it’s 3 wks until shipping”, “It’s 2 wks until shipping” notices instead. This cost me $$

Bad logistical planning on @bowflex’s part, & bad customer service. This machine better be worth the wait & the $$$. Better comm needed.

Oh yes, I knew what I was saying. Hey, I was angry! But I knew that from the first tweet with “bowflex sucks”, I would get their attention. I did receive two tweets back which I didn’t see right away, but I would swear that within 20 minutes or so, I suddenly had a phone call from…yep, you guessed it, Bowflex.

It was a civil conversation–I didn’t go all Jersey Girl on the gal who called me. Obviously, they weren’t too happy with “bowflex sucks” and apologized for the delays and the customer service. I explained that the first person I talked to was professional, and she did nothing wrong, but I didn’t like the answer, even if she was just the messenger. I was positive that “business days” was not spelled out when I put the order in, nor was it in any of the correspondence, or on the website, and I explained my disenchantment with the updates, since they clearly did not yield any information about my order.  All I wanted was transparancy about my order, is that so much to ask? I explained that this was a communications disaster, coming not only from the perspective as a consumer, but also as a technical communicator. The website was bad, at least as far as the follow-up and ordering part was concerned, and I just wanted better communication with the company. At the end of the conversation, I felt that I was heard, an apology was made, and an extra discount was scored, which was welcomed. I wasn’t looking for the extra discount (not that I wouldn’t take it), but a consumer shouldn’t have to ask for such basic information. It doesn’t have to be exact, but it does have to be clear.

Case in point–I had recently ordered something much smaller from a company on eBay. eBay said that the package was estimated to arrive on a Wednesday, and generally packages took five to nine days to arrive once it shipped. Well, my package arrived a day too late for an event on day 10, but it was still close that I can’t be as angry about that. This issue with Bowflex was VERY expensive and taking much, much longer, and I wasn’t even getting an estimate that we were even getting close to a potential shipping date. I was just getting free diet plans instead.

I tend to think that I wouldn’t have gotten a phone call if the social media person hadn’t seen that I have over 800 followers on Twitter. I’m sure that’s what prompted the call rather than hashing it out online. That’s okay. But to me, it still proves that there is significant power in the use of social media. People are using it. People do see these tweets. Companies understand the potency of one malicious tweet.

I was invited to follow the company on Facebook and direct-message them on Facebook if I had any further questions. Ironically enough, I went to the page, “liked” it, and then saw that within the last week, other consumers who had purchased their MAX machines in January either just got them (within 60 days–not business days), OR that someone had ordered it in January or February, and they were given the same line about the “business days” and said it wasn’t there when they ordered their machines. I felt validated that it wasn’t just me–it really wasn’t, so it seems! The power of social media was at work again, showing that I wasn’t wrong, and that Bowflex was trying to cover up the problems.

Don’t get me wrong–I’m still looking forward to getting my MAX machine. And I’m sure I’ll be a Bowflex convert once I get it.  The real lesson in all of this is two-fold. First, the company’s content–which includes its email notifications and its ordering website–are lacking. A consumer can’t get full disclosure about their expensive products, when a company that is as big as Bowflex/Nautilus should be much more robust. The second part of this proves that social media is a very powerful medium. It has the power to message the world and influence at an instant, in 140 characters or less.

As technical communicators, it’s our jobs to help make sure, through the web content that we help write and through the social media messages we send, that the message that we want to send out on behalf of either ourselves or our clients is a clear, concise, informative message.  It seems to me that somebody at Bowflex/Nautilus is asleep at the wheel, and I’m sure it’s not just for this product alone. The person who is handling their social media at the moment should be applauded, as I’m sure she’s going through one hell of a time dealing with disgruntled consumers like myself, and staying positive in the process. (Give that gal a raise, Bowflex.) She’s merely the messenger, and it’s a hard job, especially in customer service. (Like I said, I’ve been there, I know.)  Our job as technical communicators is really to help make life a little easier for the customer service department by giving them good information, and reducing call volumes because most of the information should be available online, especially if you did your shopping online.  Two phone calls in one day shouldn’t need to happen.  Something in the pipeline broke, but it wasn’t the social media person, and it wasn’t the customer service person. I’m just sayin’.

So, Bowflex/Nautilus, if you need a technical communicator who has your best interests at hand both as a consumer and a content analyst, let me know. I might be able to help.

Posted in Uncategorized

STC-PMC 2014 Conference – Better than last year!

NJIT's MSPTC program in the house at STCPMC14! L to R: Dr. Bernadette Longo, director of the MSPTC program; Jamil Wilkins, current MSPTC student; Danielle M. Villegas, MSPTC alum and STCPMC presenter.
NJIT’s MSPTC program in the house at #STCPMC14! L to R: Dr. Bernadette Longo, director of the MSPTC program; Jamil Wilkins, current MSPTC student; Danielle M. Villegas, MSPTC alum and STCPMC presenter.

In a nutshell, the 2014 STC-PMC Mid-Atlantic Technical Conference was better than last year, in my opinion! A slightly different format, a different day, more networking, and excellent speakers made for a fantastic event.

Okay, now for more details.

First, having been a member of the conference’s planning committee this year, I know that a lot of work went into making this event a success. Kudos to my fellow volunteers! Special care was taken to choose the best proposals submitted, and it definitely was reflected in the best of the best! There were so many great subjects to choose from that even among the presenters, some were saying to each other, “I want to go to your presentation, but I’m presenting at the same time!” I think some of the attendees also had hard choices to make, since sometimes they couldn’t decide between topics during a given session!

Nicky Bleiel, who is currently the President of the STC, gave the keynote address for the conference. She talked about flexible content with responsive design. The main message of her talk was that with responsive design, technical communicators can create and deliver a single responsive output that will work on thousands of devices, including new devices, old devices, and even ones that don’t exist yet. She showed us a few examples, such as Microsoft and Lycos websites in which the content remains the same, even though the output in different browsers changed to work with the size of a particular browser size. Many companies started making separate mobile sites, but the content was not the same as the full site. Responsive web design is Google’s preferred configuration when ranking sites. Mobile users want content parity, meaning they want everything that desktop owners have, thus they want one Web. Fluid layouts, fluid images, media queries in the coding, and stacking or collapsing grids are the key to creating responsive design.

During the first breakout session, I gave my own presentation, “Blogging Out Loud: The Basics of Blogging,” so I didn’t get a chance to see anyone else’s presentation during that time, obviously.  I did have a lot of people in my room, which pleased me, and we had a great discussion during the question-and-answer time. It was a great group, and smart questions were asked.

After a lunch break filled with awards, volunteer recognition, food, and networking, I chose to attend Todd DeLuca‘s talk about volunteering your way up the career ladder.  Todd kept the presentation fairly open, sharing some of his own insights about volunteering from his personal experiences and how they were able to apply to his professional life. The group attending participated by sharing ideas and experiences themselves about volunteering, bringing about a great conversation. Todd’s main idea was that it doesn’t matter how big or small the contribution, or if the volunteer opportunity is inside or outside of work. The experience fulfills you when helping others, but also fulfills you by allowing you to gain skills and experience that helps yourself. I think one idea he presented resonated with me, which was that volunteering is an offer to help, but it’s also a promise that evolves, as it’s a commitment that is followed through and builds trust. I also liked his point that volunteering is a safe environment to grow because usually there is less risk and some mistakes are expected, so the environment is often more nurturing than work. That’s a great environment to learn! Todd has been volunteering for things inside and outside of his job for years, related to tech comm as well as unrelated, and felt that he’s reaped benefits that apply to where he is professionally. I know that Todd will be speaking at the 2014 Spectrum conference for the STC Rochester chapter in a few weeks, and he’ll also be speaking at the STC Summit on this topic, so I encourage you to attend to get more details and ideas!

The last presentation I saw for the day was by Neil Perlin. Neil and I have known each other through both e-learning and tech comm social media circles for a while now, but hadn’t met before. It was a real treat to meet and chat with him, but to also hear him speak, as I know he’s rather popular on the e-learning and tech comm circuits. Neil’s talk was about emerging technologies, which is a subject he’s excited about and presents frequently. Neil covered a wide range of topics that are currently in use now and look to be expanding in the future. These topics included more mobile content that needs content strategy to steer it, more use of analytics to understand what our users need and use, using social media extensively, augmented reality, wearables, the use of the “cloud” and cloud-based tools. He also stated that there is a need for standards in order to future-proof our materials to avoid problems as technologies come and go, since it’s so hard to predict what will everyone use. He advised us to stay current by going to conferences and staying on top of general business issues and trends. Business issues can kill a technology, so staying current on your company business is a show of tech comm’s support of corporate strategy. His last bit of advice was to review your tools regularly for environmental change, accept the rise of content and social media, don’t denigrate tools in favor of writing, and embrace and help shape change!

After the conference, WebWorks and Publishing Smarter hosted a nice post-conference get-together at the Iron Abbey, a pub-restaurant down the street from the conference venue. It was a great treat of libations, appetizers, and networking further with tech comm peers.

Overall, it was a great experience. I liked the format this year because it felt more relaxed with fewer breakout sessions. Presenters weren’t rushed as they often are at events like these, and more time was allowed for networking with everyone. Perhaps it’s because I’d had a different experience last year as a total newbie that it was so different to me, but I don’t think so. The topics of the conference, the agenda, and the camaraderie of those hosting at the “City of Brotherly Love” came together into a pleasant Saturday of learning. As a smaller, regional conference I think the more intimate setting helped it be a more personalized experience for all, thus it was a big success.

(To any of the fellow speakers I reviewed here–if you’d like to add or correct anything that I summarized here, please feel free to do so in the comments area below!)

If you are in the Philadelphia area next year around mid-March, I highly recommend coming to next year’s STC-PMC Mid-Atlantic Conference. I guarantee you’ll enjoy it.

Posted in Uncategorized

Careers in Technical Communication – 2014

I came across this via Viqui Dill on Facebook. This is done by Carolyn Kelley Klinger, who is a very active member of the STC. This is a great overview of the potential of tech comm in the coming year. The future’s so bright, I gotta wear shades!