What Margaret Thatcher brought to the women of Tech Comm

IronLadyToday, the world lost one of the most impactful figures in international politics. Baroness Margaret Thatcher, the former Prime Minister of Britain, passed away after a stroke at the age of 87.  I’ve been watching the BBC News coverage for much of today, and I’ve heard the good, bad and ugly about her. Politics aside, I think there are certain aspects to her that over time earned her respect, even if you didn’t agree with her.

For me, as an American woman who was a teenager during her tenure as Prime Minister, I tend to have a lot of respect for her as a person–for her strong character especially. I see her as a role model for young girls even now on so many levels. First, she earned her degree in chemistry from Oxford, and worked in a plastics factory as a research chemist. So, she was a very early pioneer, in many respects, of being a woman in a STEM career, during a time when women were expected to stay and mind the home.  She was a writer as well, as proven by the fact that she earned her law degree. (She did write three books years as well.) So, she was a scientist AND a writer.

Just the fact that she was a scientist and a writer, in my mind, qualifies her to be of the technical communications mindset. She had to have an analytical mind, and be able to translate facts and information effectively into plain language, and that lent itself well to her political career.

Add to that all that, she was a mother, and a working mother at that. I’m sure she had some help from some nannies and such as her career pushed on, but she was still a mother, nonetheless.  Even if some people didn’t agree with her politics, I’m sure that her intention was that she wanted to make the world a better place not only for her children, but for fellow Britons as well.

What impressed me most, looking back at her life, and what I think gained her the respect she earned was her sense of duty and her conviction of her beliefs. It was her conviction that earned her the nickname of the “Iron Lady.”  As a woman in a very male-dominated world of politics, which I imagine wasn’t too different from being in the male-dominated world of law or science during her lifetime, she had to forge through to make her voice heard, and she pushed through to make things better in a way that she felt was appropriate. Isn’t that very much like a mum? Maybe she didn’t always make the best choices, but she did what she thought was best, and advocated as hard as any mother would. One of the things I think I remember hearing or reading about her was that she didn’t think of herself as a feminist. She just was a woman who had something to say, and the determination to make it happen.

How does this relate to women in tech comm? Well, like Margaret Thatcher, I’m sure that women have come a long way in the technical communications field. Some have come from a STEM background that still has a deficit of women even today, and some have come from a writing background. Many of us are mothers as well, or even just caretakers within our families.  Even since the time I was a child, there has been a big push to try to encourage young women towards STEM careers, as these are fields that are still unequal in female representation to this day, and to try to be working mums in these professions as well.

I can state that most of the women I have met in technical communication are iron ladies in their own right. While there is stereotype that technical communicators are naturally introverts, the truth is that we all have strong determinations that all help us forge our way in this once male-dominated field.  (Tech comm may well still be a male-dominated field for all I know, but I haven’t seen that necessarily.)

Being female technical communicators mean that as a group, we need to creating new opportunities for others–both men and women–using our brains that can translate the technical into effective writing while using our natural instincts to be advocates. The writing we do can have enormous impact on our readers if we do our jobs right.  Margaret Thatcher did things in her own way, pushed boundaries, and left the world a changed place because of her actions. Terrorism would not even get that woman to back down. What can the women of technical communication do for the world for the future? Time will tell, but as the world changes, women in tech comm definitely have a place to make those positive changes.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to What Margaret Thatcher brought to the women of Tech Comm

  1. This is a fitting tribute to Margaret Thatcher and an apt comparison with Tech Comm. Although Tech Comm is no longer a male-dominated field (women have outnumbered men for at least the past 20 years), it’s changing from a medium in which one writer speaks as the voice of authority to one in which writers and readers collaborate. Lots of opportunities for people who are assertive and who are skilled at building consensus within a community.

    • Thank you. Glad to hear that women are a vital part of tech comm now (I’ve only been in it for about a year or two, so I wouldn’t know about the other 18-19 years), but you also bring up a good point that collaboration is a big part of tech comm today. And if you think about it, Margaret Thatcher was also someone who worked on collaboration–working with the US and the USSR to bring down the Iron Curtain and end the Cold War. Not to knock guys at all, but we gals have some cool superpowers that can be used for good. ;-)

  2. I’m not saying you are wrong, but as someone who lived through the Thatcher era in the UK I shudder at the thought that she could have represented my profession. She divided opinion like no other politician of my generation.

    Interestingly there has been some debate in the UK about how her leadership style would work today. Most say it wouldn’t largely because of how we now communicate with each other. The advent of social media and rolling 24 hour news coverage means we can all now get information from many sources virtually as soon as it happens.

    The same can be said for our own deliverables.

    • I can appreciate that, Colum. This is part of the reason that I qualified that I am an American who was a teenager during her administration, just so it was understood where my perspective is. I’m sure that I’ll have my own stories about the GW Bush years and other people I didn’t like in years to come. She was certainly a controversial figure, and being in the UK, I can understand that we’d have very different perspectives. Like I said, there was some good things that she helped to perpetuate, and there were bad things, but from the point of view that here was a woman who didn’t let sexism get in her way of doing what other women hadn’t done before. Even if she was the worst PM in UK history, her presence still shattered a glass ceiling that had been there for a long time. From my Yankee perspective growing up in the early feminism years, that was a big deal. We have yet to have a woman in a similar position in the US–maybe it’ll happen with the next presidential election. Who knows?

What say you?

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s